Interested in more careers-related content? Check out our new weekly Work Life newsletter. Sent every Monday afternoon.
To be successful in your career today amid the shifting employment situation, Fanshawe professor Mahmud DeWan says you must become an architect of impact.
For a century, the formula for work in our life was simple: Learn skills, join a company, advance to higher positions and retire. “People chased offers, climbed ladders and waited – for promotions and salary raises designed by someone else. The focus stayed outside the self,” he notes in Drive, written under the pen name Prof. D1, which he also uses with students and colleagues to avoid them struggling with pronouncing his name.
Today, focus must be on developing – and promoting – your own value and potential, right from your first job. Instead of asking, “how can I be hired?” you must ask, “what can I create?” and “how can I place that value where it matters most?” Instead of, “who do you work for?” the career questions you need to answer are “what problems do you solve?” and “who benefits from your work?”
“Professionals who notice this shift early gain an advantage. They invest in skills that travel across roles and industries. They seek chances to deliver results, not just fill positions. As the sands of employment continue to move, those who define themselves by the value they create will build careers that feel resilient, meaningful and rewarding,” he says.
Your résumé must be jettisoned, or used sparingly. It’s a blunt tool, static, a record of jobs, dates, duties and education frozen onto a page. Résumés fail to reflect collaboration, the essence of today’s workplace. Instead, you need an impact portfolio, which shows how you solve problems, what changed because you were involved and where you can add value next. “Instead of asking readers to trust claims, it provides proof,” he says.
At the core, everything in it should answer three questions: What situation did you face? What did you do? What results followed?
As well as highlighting measurable results, it should reveal your problem-solving patterns and indicate the unique value you bring to specific stakeholders. It should use stories and simple visuals rather than dense lists. It should prove skills in action instead of naming them in the abstract. It should point to the future, not just your past.
The focus on results means tracking key numbers as you work, be it revenue and customer retention for sales staff, cycle times and defect rates for operations and adoption and feature use for product managers. Example: Raised annual renewal to 86 per cent from 72 per cent across 40 mid-size clients in 12 months.
“In every case, your portfolio links your actions to changes in these numbers, even if you can’t claim all the credit. This shows the reader you think in terms of impact, not just tasks,” writes Prof. DeWan, who worked previously for Deloitte, Canada Life, CIBC and RBC.
He urges you to show your pattern of solving problems. Every meaningful project starts with friction as systems break down, markets change and new opportunities appear. To tell that story, he recommends an arc he calls CASE:
- Context: sets the scene in a few sentences
- Analysis: describes how you diagnosed the real problem
- Solution: outlines what you and others did
- Effect: shows the results in numbers and stakeholder reactions
Framing the situation through that four-pronged approach allows a reader who scans a few cases to understand your style under pressure.
He stresses that an impact portfolio is not a scrapbook. It is intended to point toward the future. The living record you develop will chronicle your growth and each submission should imply what activity you want to continue. It points to what comes next by telling what happened.
It hopefully impresses others and, at the same time, sharpens your own understanding of your strengths. “As you gather metrics, revisit projects and write short cases, you see patterns in your work. Perhaps you discover you thrive in messy turnabouts or that your best results appear when you coach others not only perform tasks,” he says. That helps you to pick the right assignments for the future.
Quick hit
- Interviewing a candidate for one of her leadership development projects recently, Jenny Wood was impressed that the individual spent 15 minutes beforehand writing down thoughtful questions and sent them in advance. Most of us, she notes in her newsletter, assume we can just wing it through important meetings. Better to be prepared, thinking through what you need and want to get out of the session.
- Time management consultant Laura Vanderkam will often be asked by people whether they should switch to part-time work in order to find better balance in their life. She points out that the more important issue may be how much flexibility and control of their schedule they would have. If you have to work set hours in a set place, going part-time might not help as much as you want, because the things you want to do in your personal life won’t always happen during the hours you’re not working.
- Talent is a gift, says authors James Clear, but reliability is a choice. And every team, organization and, indeed, family needs reliability just as much as they need talent.
Harvey Schachter is a Kingston-based writer specializing in management issues. He, along with Sheelagh Whittaker, former CEO of both EDS Canada and Cancom, are the authors of When Harvey Didn’t Meet Sheelagh: Emails on Leadership.
More Stories
With limited options, WSP Global sticks with Arcadis takeover plan
WestJet must scrap weight cap on power wheelchairs, transport regulator rules
Bitcoin, crypto shares climb after Trump pushes Clarity Act