The Canada Nation

Your Trusted news Source

Consider snoozing through the coming U.S. midterms

Consider snoozing through the coming U.S. midterms



Open this photo in gallery:

The United States Capitol in Washington. Tuning out the noise that surrounds an election has been a good call for investors who hold a broad basket of U.S. stocks.Eric Lee/Reuters

The U.S. midterm elections are dominating the headlines with just one more week of rallies, scandals and prognostications before voters decide which party will control the House and the Senate.

There is a lot at stake here for Americans and, potentially, for Canadians and others too. But should investors care?

Politics has become a central theme for investors, given the sometimes outrageous influence that U.S. President Donald Trump seems to exert on everything from trade to energy prices to debt costs.

Yet, for all the consternation, tuning out the noise has been a good call for investors holding a broad basket of U.S. stocks: The S&P 500 has gained 34 per cent since Trump’s presidential election victory in 2024.

But that doesn’t mean political decisions have had no impact.

Energy stocks – including Canadian names – have soared with Trump’s war against Iran. And stocks associated with artificial intelligence have met with little or no regulatory pushback.

Anthropic sets stage for blockbuster IPO, highlighting AI’s benefits and risks for humanity

Conversely, let’s not forget about bonds. Prices have been hit as inflationary pressures build, sending yields higher and leaving investors wondering if a financial crisis could be brewing.

Chris Galipeau, head market strategist at Franklin Templeton Institute, looked at the historical market performance under different midterm scenarios over the past 10 election cycles when a Republican president has been in the White House.

There was a strong market reaction within three months of the results. But market performance didn’t vary much within a year, according to Galipeau’s numbers.

When Republicans controlled both the Senate and the House, in 2002, the S&P 500 gained 14.9 per cent within a year. When Democrats controlled both, which happened seven times since 1954, the index gained an average of 14.8 per cent.

And when the Republicans controlled the Senate and the Democrats controlled the House, in 1982 and 2018, the index gained 15.5 per cent on average.

From the best outcome to the worst, there is a difference of 18 percentage points within three months. But the difference shrinks to just a 0.7 percentage point within a year.

“Investors have a tendency to believe that politics heavily influence equity markets. The reality is quite different historically after midterm elections,” Galipeau said in his report.

What impact could the midterms have on Trump’s second term? We answered your questions

However, he can’t guarantee that history will repeat this time around, simply because there are other factors to consider.

Corporate profits are rising at a rapid pace. But just 10 companies – including Nvidia Corp., Micron Technology Inc. and Meta Platforms Inc. – within the S&P 500 account for about two-thirds of this growth, according to an analysis in The Wall Street Journal.

That could make stocks sensitive to a pullback regardless of how the midterms turn out.

Another important factor is the direction of interest rates. The Federal Reserve raised its key rate last month, and persistent inflation could push the central bank to raise rates again, adding a significant headwind to the bull market in stocks and the economy.

A third factor: Trump is still president.

“The policy differences between a split Congress – Democratic House and Republican Senate – and a Democratic sweep are simply not all that different given Trump is in the White House with veto authority,” Libby Cantrill, head of public policy at PIMCO, said in a note.

History suggests investors can simply hit the snooze button on Nov. 3. But what is your investment approach to the U.S. midterms? Let me know at dberman@globeandmail.com.



David’s personal finance reading list

Nearly 9 in 10 Canadian equity funds underperformed in first half

And by a considerable margin. Actively managed Canadian equity funds delivered an average return of 8.8 per cent in the first six months of the year, according to the latest S&P Indices Versus Active (SPIVA) scorecard. The S&P/TSX Composite Index gained 11.2 per cent.

Older grandparents have more aches and pains, and more money for grandkids

People are having children later in life, which means that older generations are becoming grandparents later in life as well. There is an upside to this trend, though (for subscribers to The Wall Street Journal).

The upside of surging bond yields

Lisa Shalett, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management’s chief investment officer, thinks that the selloff in Treasury bonds may have gone too far. Bonds may now be more on a buying opportunity than a warning sign.


Influencing looks glamorous. But does it pay the rent?

In this week’s episode of The Globe’s Stress Test podcast, hosts Roma Luciw and Meera Raman speak with three Canadian influencers about their finances, from a full-time food creator earning six figures to a nurse making tens of thousands of dollars a year from a social media side hustle. They break down what brands pay, what it costs to create content and why a big following doesn’t always mean a big paycheque.



Chart of the day

Young adults are taking a more pragmatic and career-oriented approach to education than previous generations, says Mike Moffatt in this chart. Pushed to pursue safe degrees, students are shunning the humanities in favour of engineering, business and the sciences. Why does that matter?


Today’s financial tool

Callum Stocker is an 18-year old student in Vancouver who recently faced the daunting task of applying to universities – each with its own deadlines and admission requirements. So he built an online tool, called AcceptMe, that gathers all the information in one place. It covers 104 Canadian universities and more than 1,300 programs. It is free to all applicants or their parents.


In the social sphere

Watch

Kenneth Rogoff, the Harvard University professor and former economist at the International Monetary Fund, warns of a potential 30-per-cent stock market crash and the risk of a U.S. debt crisis.

The money-free zone

Booker Prize-winning author Marlon James answers questions about his writing and researching process – and how he deals with the urge to procrastinate. If you’re not already a fan of James, you will be now.


ICYMI

Globe and Mail stories from the last few days